Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6469161
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T05:57:31+00:00 2026-05-25T05:57:31+00:00

As far as I am aware, for the property to be saved in the

  • 0

As far as I am aware, for the property to be saved in the database it cannot be ReadOnly.
IIdentity properties: AuthenticationType, IsAuthenticated and Name are all ReadOnly.

Is making the wrapper to the properties that need to be saved the only solution or there are better ones?

EDIT:
I might not have explained my question that well. Here is the sample code for one of the ReadOnly properties, I have added UserName property for the Entity Framework:

Public Property UserName As String
    Get
        Return _userName 
    End Get
    Private Set(value As String)
        userName = value
    End Set

Public ReadOnly Property Name As String Implements System.Security.Principal.IIdentity.Name
    Get
        Return UserName
    End Get
End Property

What I wanted to ask is if there is any better way of doing it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T05:57:31+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 5:57 am

    IIdentity properties are read only but the implementation can have setters. If you are using EDMX for mapping you don’t have to expose these setters as public.

    Edit:

    This is possible in C# so hopefully you can use similar approach with VB.NET (I can only read VB code, not write):

    public interface ITest {
        string Name { get; }
    }
    
    public class Test : ITest {
        public string Name { get; set; }
    }
    

    The class offers setter even the interface didn’t define it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

As far as I'm aware, plain html or javascript won't allow me to upload
As far as I am aware, versions prior to Jelly Beans, had Set and
The advantages of DI, as far as I am aware, are: Reduced Dependencies More
I just tried to override the standard synthesised setters of a property. So far
I'm currently trying to use write a simple C# wrapper class for all the
As far as im aware, the WebView is the same thing as the built
As far as I'm aware, this is done via the net command. However, the
As far as I'm aware there are two main styles of permissions systems out
As far as I am aware, a <form></form> tag is supposed to be invisible
This isn't a big issue for me (as far as I'm aware), it's more

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.