Question

As far as I can understand, the linq method FirstOrDefault() returns null if a record-set is empty. Why can’t use the ?? operator against the function? Like so:

Double d = new Double[]{}.FirstOrDefault() ?? 0.0;

Update

I don’t want to check if d is null later on in my code. And doing:

Double d new Double[]{}.FirstOrDefault() == null
       ? 0.0 
       : new Double[]{}.FirstOrDefault();

… or:

var r = new Double[]{}.FirstOrDefault();

Double d = r == null ? 0.0 : r;

… seems a bit overkill–I’d like to do this null-check in one line of code.

Answer 1

Actually, FirstOrDefault<T>() returns T, which is either a value or default(T).

default(T) is either null or (T)0 for value types (like double)