Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 451163
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T21:56:28+00:00 2026-05-12T21:56:28+00:00

As far as I know, BOL exmaple on fn_trace_getinfo used to use :: instead

  • 0

As far as I know, BOL exmaple on fn_trace_getinfo used to use
:: instead of sys schema in the example like following

From

    SELECT * FROM ::fn_trace_getinfo(default)

To

    SELECT * FROM sys.fn_trace_getinfo(default)

Are there any differences between those two?
And what does :: mean?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T21:56:29+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 9:56 pm

    OK, i hope this (UDF starting with fn_…) helps

    From the page it seems that :: would tell Sql Server that this has to be a System UDF, and will only be found in Master DB.

    Q:

    I’ve read frequently how stored
    procedures we create shouldn’t be
    named with sp_ since SQL Server will
    first check the master db before the
    current db when trying to find the sp
    to execute. I always nodded and
    thought how I was glad I hadn’t done
    that. For some reason it never clicked
    that UDF behavior could be the same.

    I have several UDFs that start fn_…
    When I reference a UDF as dbo.fn_…
    does SQL Server check the master db
    for these and only upon not finding
    them check the current db? If so, is
    there a performance hit for this?

    A:

    No. To call a system-supplied UDF, you
    need to use ::, so that is what SQL
    Server looks for. All system-supplied
    UDFs are table functions, as scalar
    system functions are not UDFs at all.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 235k
  • Answers 235k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You could use MapReduce like Google does, either via Hadoop… May 13, 2026 at 6:07 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'm afraid that's the way it is. Without exceptions, you… May 13, 2026 at 6:07 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Something like this. window.onorientationchange = function() { var orientation =… May 13, 2026 at 6:07 am

Related Questions

According to BOL (SQL Server Books Online) on sp_dbcmptlevel , This feature will be
As far as I know, foreign keys (FK) are used to aid the programmer
As far as I know, Flash has to pass info off to another external
As far as I know, in gcc you can write something like: #define DBGPRINT(fmt...)

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.