Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6666519
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T02:50:13+00:00 2026-05-26T02:50:13+00:00

As far as I know, StringBuilder helps to reduce memory usage by not creating

  • 0

As far as I know, StringBuilder helps to reduce memory usage by not creating temporary string instances in the string pool during concats.
But, what happens if I do sth like this:

StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder("bu");
sb.append("b"+"u");

Does it compile into

sb.append("b");
sb.append("u");

? Or it depends on optimalization flags? Or I loose the whole benefit if stringbuilders?
Or this quetion makes no sense? 🙂

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T02:50:14+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 2:50 am

    It compiles to sb.append("bu"), because the compiler translates the concatenation of multiple String litterals to a single String litteral.

    If you had

    String a = "a";
    sb.append(a + "b");
    

    it would compile it to

    String a = "a";
    String temp = a + "b"; // useless creation of a string here
    sb.append(temp);
    

    So you should prefer

    sb.append(a);
    sb.append("b");
    

    in this case.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

As far as i know it is not possible to do the following in
As far as I know (not much I'll admit), the currently popular programming paradigms
As far I know this is not supported for asp.net projects. It's quite handy
Python, as far as know, does not allow modification of an archived file. That
As far as I know that above is not possible in below case. I
As far as know, I must be careful with PHP, and I think Javascript.
As far as I know, foreign keys (FK) are used to aid the programmer
As far as I know, Flash has to pass info off to another external
As far as I know, in gcc you can write something like: #define DBGPRINT(fmt...)
As far as I know, there's no way to use {% include %} within

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.