Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 320105
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T08:43:22+00:00 2026-05-12T08:43:22+00:00

As far as I know, the first one you have to release when you

  • 0

As far as I know, the first one you have to release when you are done, and the second one you don’t. Why would you use the first initialization over the second?

NSMutableDictionary *dictionary = [[NSMutableDictionary alloc] initWithObjectsAndKeys:@"title", @"text", nil];

And

NSMutableDictionary *dictionary = [NSMutableDictionary dictionaryWithObjectsAndKeys:@"title", @"text", nil];
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T08:43:22+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 8:43 am

    As others have said, in one sense there is no difference between your two examples, just that the first one returns a retained object that will not be dealloc’d until you expicitly release it, and the second one is an autoreleased object that will be automatically released at the beginning of the next run loop unless you explicitly retain it before then.

    However the key part to your question is:

    Why would you use the first
    initialization over the second?

    The commonly regarded approach (support by Apple documentation) is that using autoreleased objects is absolutely fine in most cases. I would not agree with Peter Lewis here about the iPhone being so “underpowered” that you need to avoid autoreleased objects. The additional overhead on the phone on supplying autoreleased objects in most apps is miniscule. Therefore feel free to use autoreleased objects generally in your code, and just explicitly retain them if you need to hang on to them.

    However, where it does make a difference is in tight loops. If you are running a while loop for example which executes 1000 times, and you are creating objects within that loop that you will not need afterwards, then you should explicitly create new non-autoreleased objects and explicitly release them. This is because the autorelease pool will not (by default) empty inside the tight loop. Creating a large bunch of autoreleased objects could well start to hit the limitations of the device’s memory.

    So in summary; use 2) most of the time, but use 1) if you’re going to be creating and ditching a lot of objects at one time.

    Hope that helps

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have 2 spans. First one: <span class=body> Second one: <span class=desc> My CSS:
As far as I know, there's no way to use {% include %} within
I am pretty far into my first Android application, and I have the sneaking
As far as I know, foreign keys (FK) are used to aid the programmer
As far as I know, Flash has to pass info off to another external
As far as I know, in gcc you can write something like: #define DBGPRINT(fmt...)
As far as i know it is not possible to do the following in
As far as I know (not much I'll admit), the currently popular programming paradigms
The problem I'm running into is that as far as I know the delete
I know FireBug with YSlow has to be by far my personal favourite. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.