Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6717485
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T08:51:30+00:00 2026-05-26T08:51:30+00:00

As far as I know, there are two possible calling conventions for the x64

  • 0

As far as I know, there are two possible calling conventions for the x64 code – Microsoft x64 and AMD64.

Now, gcc can be launched with the -mregparm=0 parameter, which doesn’t work if we are working using the AMD64 calling convention. This happens because the AMD64 convention mandates the usage of the registers for the first 6 variables (I’m not really sure why this is done, but I suspect it’s implemented due do possibly stack security issues).

So, here is the question:

Are there some strict rules like this (forced register usage) when compiling using gcc under Microsoft x64 convention? And, if yes, how can they be bypassed without breaking the ABI compatibility?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T08:51:30+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 8:51 am

    I don’t know Microsoft Windows (and never used it), so I probably cannot answer your question about it.

    However, the AMD64 Application Binary Interface calling conventions (On Linux and other Unixes) are documented in the AMD64 ABI spec (maybe you should also find and read the equivalent document for Microsoft calling conventions). I believe they are using registers for the 6 first arguments because of performance considerations (passing values thru register is faster than passing them on the stack), not because of security considerations.

    And whatever C++ compiler you use, you want it to follow some calling conventions, and these are practically dictated by the system (because you want to be able to call system libraries from your code). So if you break them, you will break the ABI compatibility.

    But I cannot guess why are asking such a question. Are you developing a compiler with its own calling conventions? If yes, you still should have some means to call C libraries, and this required that for call to external C libraries, you follow the ABI conventions governing them. Look into the Ocaml compiler for an example.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

As far as I know, in gcc you can write something like: #define DBGPRINT(fmt...)
As far as I know there are two ways to get the value from
As far as I know there is no way to do this, but I
As far as I know there's some kind of Linux in the Chrome OS
As far as I know, there's no way to use {% include %} within
As far as i know, there is no direct equivalent in C#. My current
As far as i know it is not possible to do the following in
as far as you might know, there are contacts (aggregate contacts) which are formed
As far as know, I must be careful with PHP, and I think Javascript.
As far as I know, foreign keys (FK) are used to aid the programmer

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.