Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 344917
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T11:02:06+00:00 2026-05-12T11:02:06+00:00

As far as I know, what I ask here isn’t possible, but I thought

  • 0

As far as I know, what I ask here isn’t possible, but I thought I’d ask anyway in case I’m missing something.

Suppose you want to let users upload JPG images, and these images are scaled into smaller icons and the original images are always discarded and never required again. Is there any way that would commonly work in most modern browsers that would let the user select a single image on their hard drive, have that LOCALLY turned into a thumbnail and upload the created thumbnail to a server?

In a case where the server just needs a small image, it would be wasteful both in user time and server resources to proceed uploading the whole image, only to immediately discard it. It would be much better to just scale it on the client.

I can imagine three options. Just plain HTML/Javascript, using Flash or using Java. If this were possible with Flash, that would seem like the best option. But reading flash.net.FileReference documentation, it seems that you can upload a file from the HD yes, but you cannot look inside the file you are uploading. On the other hand, if you enable “can access local files” in Flash publishing options, it seems that you can then no longer access the net, so that doesn’t work.

With HTML/Javascript, it is possible to load images and display them on a <canvas>, but if you try to access the pixels of these images, you get security violations, so that doesn’t seem to work.

Java I hesitate to use, because only 96.52% of my users have it installed, and the file upload dialogs I have seen implemented in Java (at Facebook for example) have not worked well (unresponsive interface). I wonder though if Java is the only thing allowing resizing images from local HD?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T11:02:06+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 11:02 am

    I think if there was a reasonably reliable and user-friendly way to accomplish this, it’d be done on sites like Facebook already. People are used to having to upload the original image… it’s always nice to be able to improve on an established UX, but if you can only match it, you’re not exactly losing out.

    JavaScript is out, because JS cannot read anything directly from the client; it can only direct the browser to load a pre-defined local path, or load bytes from the server.

    Flash’s security sandbox also prevents this, as you pointed out.

    Java has a different set of problems – people rarely install applets these days unless they trust the site more than their own family members. It’s also apparently extremely difficult to build something reliable and usable, as evidenced by Facebook-esque companies which have practically unlimited resources to throw at the problem and still fail.

    So, in summary – no, and don’t worry too much about it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

As far as I know, in gcc you can write something like: #define DBGPRINT(fmt...)
As far as i know it is not possible to do the following in
i want to ask why are the java annotations used so much... I know
As far as I know, foreign keys (FK) are used to aid the programmer
As far as I know, Flash has to pass info off to another external
As far as I know (not much I'll admit), the currently popular programming paradigms
As far as I know, there's no way to use {% include %} within
The problem I'm running into is that as far as I know the delete
I know FireBug with YSlow has to be by far my personal favourite. I
As far as variable naming conventions go, should iterators be named i or something

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.