Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7177207
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T16:39:51+00:00 2026-05-28T16:39:51+00:00

As far as indexing goes, is it proper to index all fields that will

  • 0

As far as indexing goes, is it proper to index all fields that will be searched (within a WHERE) clause to speed up SELECTS? For example my database contains a profiles table which stores user information such as name, intrestCode,zip, description, and email. The profile record is identified by a PRIMARY id column which uniquely corresponds with the userid. I made zip and intrestCode an index since profiles will be searched by zip and possibly intrestCode (SELECT `blah`,`blah`... FROM profile WHERE zip=?, SELECT `blah`,`blah`... FROM profile WHERE zip=? && intrestCode=?). Am I doing it right?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T16:39:52+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 4:39 pm

    Sounds basically correct. You should be aware that you can’t use two different indices on the same table in the same query, so if you ran

    CREATE INDEX `zip` ON `profile` (`zip`);
    CREATE INDEX `intrestCode` ON `profile` (`intrestCode`);
    

    then the query

    SELECT `blah`,`blah`... FROM profile WHERE zip=? && intrestCode=?
    

    can only look up one table from the index. The secret here is that you can create a single index on two tables, like so:

    CREATE INDEX `zip+intrestCode` ON `profile` (`zip`, `intrestCode`);
    

    MySQL can use this for queries that use either zip alone in the WHERE clause, or use both zip and intrestCode, but not for queries that use only intrestCode in the WHERE clause.

    (This is because each index covers the whole table. If MySQL were to try and look up zip and intrestCode from different tables, then it would be retrieving lots of irrelevant rows from the second index. Therefore, it only looks at one index. If you want it to use the index on both columns, you need to have one index that includes both columns.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Far I've found that giving the iframe a background colour will alter the timeline
So far I thought that the following syntax was invalid, int B[ydim][xdim]; But today
One of the barriers (that as far as I know was never removed, but
Far as best practices are concerned, which is better: public void SomeMethod(string str) {
As far as I know, foreign keys (FK) are used to aid the programmer
So far I have encountered adjacency list, nested sets and nested intervals as models
As far as I know, Flash has to pass info off to another external
As far as I know, in gcc you can write something like: #define DBGPRINT(fmt...)
As far as i know it is not possible to do the following in
As far as variable naming conventions go, should iterators be named i or something

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.