Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8929535
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T08:41:29+00:00 2026-06-15T08:41:29+00:00

As I study different sections in the C++ standard ( Where do I find

  • 0

As I study different sections in the C++ standard ( Where do I find the current C or C++ standard documents? ), I would like to refer back to the “Terms and definitions”, §1.3.

However, the terms and definitions are provided in a form that I cannot adequately understand or interpret, and there is no explanation given in the text regarding how to interpret them.

Consider the very first term that is defined in the “Terms and definitions” section of the standard:

1.3.1 [defns.argument]

argument

actual argument

actual parameter

<function call expression> expression in the comma-separated list
bounded by the parentheses

  1. What does [defns.argument] refer to?
  2. What is the meaning and purpose of the lines actual argument and actual parameter?
  3. Does <function call expression> refer to a different “term or definition”? If so, it’s not defined in the “Terms and definitions” section – why not? If not, what does it refer to? (NOTE: I am not asking what “function call expression” means, because I already know; instead, I am asking how to read and interpret the “Terms and definitions” section of the C++ standard using this simple example.)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T08:41:30+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 8:41 am
    1. What does [defns.argument] refer to?

      [defns.argument] is the section tag; it is intended to be used for editorial purposes as it is invariant under section renumbering (e.g. in response to insertion, removal or reordering of sections). It can also be used in referring to the standard, but section numbers (relative to a published version of the standard) are more concise.

    2. What is the meaning and purpose of the lines actual argument and actual parameter?

      “actual argument” and “actual parameter” are aliases for the term “argument“. You will see below under 1.3.14 [defns.parameter] that “formal argument” and “formal parameter” are aliases for the term “parameter“.

      The terms “actual argument” and “actual parameter” only appear in [defns.argument]; “formal argument” is described as an alias in 8.3.5p11, and “formal parameter” is used in approximately 13 places, a small fraction of the number of places where “parameter” is used.

    3. Does <function call expression> refer to a different “term or definition”?

      The angle-bracketed term is the context in which this definition applies. For example, “argument” has a different meaning in the context of a “function call expression” to in the context of a “function-like macro“.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to make a self-study or 'flash card' type form using MS
I am trying to learn Django and for this I would like to study
When I study about cloud-computing, I usually see these terms: on-premise, off-premise applications. I
I would like to compare the values of the elements under a node fetched
In my app, I want to apply different video filters like: Fade in -Out,Snow
I study different DI patterns. And now I interested in the lazy life-time implementation.
I play to self-study 6.001 with the video lectures and lecture handouts. However, I
My first project using two different new technologies would be to implement some session
I was trying to study different exceptions in Java and came across the OutOfMemoryError
Study guide question: I have no idea what the difference is between writing it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.