Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 896175
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T14:41:11+00:00 2026-05-15T14:41:11+00:00

As in title. I’m considering to use separate tables with JOIN or use single

  • 0

As in title.

I’m considering to use separate tables with JOIN or use single table, basically I’m worried about the performance.

Thank you.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T14:41:12+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 2:41 pm

    This is called vertical partitioning. It can reduce I/O if you can separate less frequently used columns into their own table but will likely add overhead if most of your queries end up joining the tables. Especially if both tables are on the same disc.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Title pretty much says it all. I want to use streeview for an area
The title might be a bit confusing, basically I'm trying to write up a
Title is the entire question. Can someone give me a reason why this happens?
Title says what i'm trying to do. I can successfully generate an assembly if
Title says it mostly. I want to add a simple extension method to the
Title might be a bit confusing, so let me explain. I have a website
Title field is sealed. Any attempts to update the default value resets the value
Title pretty much sums it up. The external style sheet has the following code:
Title: Eclipse plug-in development Unable to instantiate class due to java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Trying to build
Title more or less says it all. Specifically, I've become increasingly annoyed that in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.