Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 767267
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T17:11:06+00:00 2026-05-14T17:11:06+00:00

As part of my (new) database version control methodology, I’m writing a change script

  • 0

As part of my (new) database version control methodology, I’m writing a “change script” and want the change script to insert a new row into the SchemaChangeLog table if the script is executed successfully, or to reverse changes if any single change in the script fails.

Is it possible to do schema changes in a transaction and only if it gets committed to then do the INSERT?

For example (psuedo-code, I’m not too good with SQL):

SET XACT_ABORT ON
BEGIN TRANSACTION
PRINT 'Add Col2 to Table1'
IF NOT EXIST (SELECT * FROM sys.columns WHERE NAME='Col2' AND object_id=OBJECT_ID('Table1'))
BEGIN
    ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Table1]
    ADD Col2 int NULL
END
INSERT INTO SchemaChangeLog(MajorVer, MinorVer, PointVer, ScriptName, AppliedDate) VALUES(N'01', N'01', N'0000', N'update.01.01.0000.sql', GETDATE())
COMMIT TRANSACTION
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T17:11:07+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 5:11 pm

    If you want two actions to be atomic, embed them in a transaction. So your two actions are 1) ALTER TABLE and 2) INSERT INTO SchemaChangeLog. Therefore, your BEGIN TRANSACTION must occur before the ALTER TABLE, and the COMMIT after the INSERT.

    As a side note, there is is an already built-in mechanism into SQL Server for tracking schema changes, it works out of the box and the best is that it will catch everybody’s changes, not only yours: Event Notifications.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.