Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9161075
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T13:53:12+00:00 2026-06-17T13:53:12+00:00

As the question says. At the moment we’re caching the WCF client proxy (ChannelFactory

  • 0

As the question says. At the moment we’re caching the WCF client proxy (ChannelFactory to be precise) to our services per session. This works fine. But now we’ve moved to Azure, and there are multiple instances (of session). I got AppFabric session state working now. So the session is provided by Azure, but now the problem is with caching of the channel factory. Because the factory is not [Serializable] and therefore it seems cannot be stored in the Session[]. What are the options? Should the channel be recreated every time the WCF service method is being called?

[ 1. previous working state; 2. newly attempted solution; 3. fall-back option ]

  1. WCF Client -> ASP.NET -> Session cached factory -> Channel -> WCF Service
  2. WCF Client -> ASP.NET -> Cannot store factory! -> Channel -> Azure role WCF Service
  3. WCF Client -> ASP.NET -> New channel each call -> Azure role WCF Service

Update: We’ve established, that it won’t be possible to cache (share) the ChannelFactory. So the question remains, how can I share the credentials (UserNameCredentials) which are therefore not being shared now, and somehow have to be distributed across the split instances. The obvious option is to store the encrypted credentials in a cache? Is it a good idea? Is there any other way to do it?

This continues as a new question: How to share WCF client credentials…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T13:53:13+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 1:53 pm

    If you want to cache the ChannelFactory, you are going to need to have one per session per azure role instance. You are correct that CacheFactories should not be shared across sessions as they may be supporting different users.

    As you’ve rightly said, a CacheFactory is not serializable, so you’re not going to be able to put it into the distributed cache.

    Half the reason to cache it is to avoid the set-up time for the CacheFactory (may be many 10’s of milliseconds). Serializing it into and out of the cache may be even longer than that as the CacheFactory is fairly large in size.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Question says it all. I'm just having trouble figuring this out. What i'm trying
The question says it all, really. I know a (Scala) Monad looks like this:
This answer on another question says that array.map(&:to_s) is faster than array.map { |n|
In this question regarding magic numbers in arrays, paxdiablo says that any number other
Question says it all. I tried browsing through the latest tag but could not
Question says it all. Some quick code examples of usage would be nice.. thanks!
Question says it all. Does anyone know if the following... size_t div(size_t value) {
The question says it all. I am looking for a build.xml file browser where
The question says it all, I am trying to use an external library in
As question says, How do I create such an app ? How do I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.