Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6967755
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T16:21:45+00:00 2026-05-27T16:21:45+00:00

As we are having many components , I am trying to describe all the

  • 0

As we are having many components , I am trying to describe all the baselines using following command

cleartool describe -l baseline:Baseline_2.1.0.13@\My_PVOB

It provides output like follows

"Build 13"
master replica: My_PVOB@\My_PVOB
owner: Admin
group: ABC
stream:Components_Integration@\My_PVOB
component: Baselines@\My_PVOB
label status: No Versions to Label
change sets:
promotion level: INITIAL
depends on:
  Baseline_2.1.0.13.8206@\My_PVOB (Comp1@\My_PVOB)
  Baseline_2.1.0.13.433@\My_PVOB (Comp2@\My_PVOB)
  Baseline_2.1.0.13.423@\My_PVOB (Comp3@\My_PVOB)
  Baseline_2.1.0.13.3763@\My_PVOB (Comp4@\My_PVOB)

Actually i want to get contents only below depends on: ( Want to get Just following contents)

Baseline_2.1.0.13.8206@\My_PVOB (Comp1@\My_PVOB)
  Baseline_2.1.0.13.433@\My_PVOB (Comp2@\My_PVOB)
  Baseline_2.1.0.13.423@\My_PVOB (Comp3@\My_PVOB)
  Baseline_2.1.0.13.3763@\My_PVOB (Comp4@\My_PVOB)

How to omit the remaining information?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T16:21:46+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 4:21 pm

    From the fmt_ccase man page:

    %[depends_on]Cp
    

    (UCM baselines) The baselines that the composite baseline directly depends on

    So for a composite baseline:

    cleartool descr -fmt "%[depends_on]Cp" baseline:aBaseline@\apvob
    

    could do the trick, except it will print only the dependent baselines on one line, each name separated by space, and without their associated component name.

    So you need to parse that output, and for each baseline name, do a:

    cleartool descr -fmt "%[component]Xp" baseline:aBaseline@\apvob
    

    (Or, if your naming convention for baselines allows for it, a simple:

    cleartool describe -l baseline:Baseline_2.1.0.13@\My_PVOB | grep Baseline_ 
    

    would be easier!)


    Actually, the OP samselvaprabu took the last proposition to grep what he needed from the initial output. His grep is better than my proposal, because it doesn’t depend on the Baseline naming convention, but on the PVob name of said baselines:

    I am using windows so your last(simple) command gave me the idea.
    Following command works in Dos

    cleartool describe -l baseline:Baseline_2.1.0.13@\My_PVOB | find "@\My_PVOB)" 
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm having the following many to many relationship in Rails (ActiveResource, of course): class
I am using the 2010 version of Visual Studio, but am having many problems
I'm having troubles on an ASPX form using two ASP default components; The default
Flex 3 question: I trying here to avoid having to bind resources to all
There are many basic graph algorithms such as topological sort, strongly/weakly connected components, all-pairs/single-source
I'm having (many, but for now,) one problem with a project I'm working on.
I have 2 tables having many to many relation and hence there is junction
I am having many problems running DJ. Primarily, I cannot get delayed_job running any
I gave uni association having many to many relationship between two entities, from C
I am creating a simple Android widget with a typical usecase of having many

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.