Home/ Questions/Q 3350422
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-18T01:47:05+00:00

As you know, the built-in themes all define styles for the standard controls such

  • 0

As you know, the built-in themes all define styles for the standard controls such as the TreeView control. We’re trying to create something that looks an awful lot like a TreeView but isn’t actually one, nor is it a subclass of one. It just has parts that we want to look like one for consistency.

For instance, our control too has a selected item whose background we’d love to match to the appearance of the background for the selected item in a TreeView (or more accurately the TreeViewItem) for the current theme. (You can’t simply use highlight color as the themes have nice gradient brushes and borders, not just a solid brush.) Same with our expand/collapse togglebuttons. We want them to look just like the ones used in a TreeView for the current theme. (i.e. Sometimes a triangle, sometimes a box with a ‘+’ in it, etc.)

Now while we can simply rip open Expression and copy the styles ourselves (or at least the parts that we need), we’d have to do that for each and every theme that MS provides. Plus, that wouldn’t handle newer themes. And in a purest standpoint, that’s duplicate styling information which just sits wrong with me.

Also, if someone styles the actual TreeView(Item), we want to pick it up as well. Since the parts that we want to style are required parts of a TreeView, we feel pretty confident that they’re in there somewhere style-wise.

Not even sure what I want to do is possible but if anyone knows, they’re most likely here on SO!

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    Yet another question close to a month old without even a comment. Very odd for the SO community to not chime in at least once! Guess it’s not possible.

    Well, what we ended up doing was using ‘Show Me The Template’ (Google it) to get the templates for the part (we don’t have Expression), then manually managing them ourselves instead of using the built-in styles. NOT at all what we wanted to do since we don’t know of a way to get the nice gradients that are defined in the system already without duplicating them, but the end result does match perfectly so there’s that. As such, this too is getting marked as the answer. I’ll gladly change it if someone else actually gives me one that works (or is close enough! Just need something people! Feel like I’m posting in a vacuum here!

    • 0