Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3212802
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T14:52:33+00:00 2026-05-17T14:52:33+00:00

Assume I have a class that is unknown until runtime. At runtime I get

  • 0

Assume I have a class that is unknown until runtime.
At runtime I get a reference, x, of type Type referencing to Foo.GetType().
Only by using x and List<>, can I create a list of type Foo?

How to do that?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T14:52:34+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 2:52 pm
    Type x = typeof(Foo);
    Type listType = typeof(List<>).MakeGenericType(x);
    object list = Activator.CreateInstance(listType);
    

    Of course you shouldn’t expect any type safety here as the resulting list is of type object at compile time. Using List<object> would be more practical but still limited type safety because the type of Foo is known only at runtime.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Assume I have a class foo, and wish to use a std::map to store
Using this as a simplified example, assume I have a table that has some
Assume I have a class that looks like this: class Sample { public string
Assume you have a class that defines virtual methods with the access specifier public.
So assume I have a class that has an init method that does something
Assume I have a form class SampleClass(forms.Form): name = forms.CharField(max_length=30) age = forms.IntegerField() django_hacker
Assume I have a function template like this: template<class T> inline void doStuff(T* arr)
Assume I have an ASP.NET MVC app that's not doing anything too fancy (no
I have a class that implements properties in a specific way, to handle some
Assume I have created a compiled re: x = re.compile('^\d+$') Is there a way

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.