Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7582229
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T18:23:07+00:00 2026-05-30T18:23:07+00:00

Assume the following parallel process in Groovy/Gpars…. def result GParsPool.withPool(5){ result = idList.collectParallel{processItem(it)} }

  • 0

Assume the following parallel process in Groovy/Gpars….

def result
GParsPool.withPool(5){ 
   result = idList.collectParallel{processItem(it)}
}

If result is just an array list, and, assuming no thread accesses or manipulates result in processItem(), does result need to be explicitly synchronized? I need to know if I should be doing this instead…

def result = Collections.synchronizedList( new ArrayList())
GParsPool.withPool(5){ 
   result = idList.collectParallel{processItem(it)}
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T18:23:08+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 6:23 pm

    I would be surprised if the result being returned is a List, but if you look at this comment:

    Iterates over a collection/object with the collect() method using an asynchronous variant of the supplied closure to evaluate each collection’s element.
    After this method returns, all the closures have been finished and the caller can safely use the result.
    It’s important to protect any shared resources used by the supplied closure from race conditions caused by multi-threaded access.
    If any of the collection’s elements causes the closure to throw an exception, the exception is re-thrown.

    here:
    http://code.google.com/p/gparallelizer/source/browse/trunk/src/main/groovy/groovyx/gpars/Parallel.groovy?r=1138

    it appears that when everything is done you can safely use the result, without having to have it synchronized.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Assume the following code in a Grails controller: def action = { ClassName o
Lets assume following classes definition: public class A { public final static String SOME_VALUE;
Assume the following class: public class MyEnum: IEnumerator { private List<SomeObject> _myList = new
Assume the following: models.py class Entry(models.Model): title = models.CharField(max_length=50) slug = models.CharField(max_length=50, unique=True) body
Assume the following code: using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(connectionString)) { ... using (SqlCommand
Assume the following type definitions: public interface IFoo<T> : IBar<T> {} public class Foo<T>
Assume the following scenario. I have two files A.cpp and B.cpp in trunk. At
assume this following function: int binaryTree::findHeight(node *n) { if (n == NULL) { return
Assume the following: we have class B, which is a private class nested inside
If I use a lambda expression like the following // assume sch_id is a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.