Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 173563
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T13:21:57+00:00 2026-05-11T13:21:57+00:00

Assume we have: $a = @(1, @(2, @(3))) I would like to flatten $a

  • 0

Assume we have:

$a = @(1, @(2, @(3))) 

I would like to flatten $a to get @(1, 2, 3).

I have found one solution:

@($a | % {$_}).count 

But maybe there is a more elegant way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 3 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T13:21:57+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:21 pm

    Piping is the correct way to flatten nested structures, so I’m not sure what would be more ‘elegant’. Yes, the syntax is a bit line-noisy looking, but frankly quite serviceable.

    2020 Edit

    The recommended syntax these days is to expand % to ForEach-Object. A bit more verbose but definitely more readable:

    @($a | ForEach-Object {$_}).count 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Assume I have the following input in Pig: some And I would like to
assume I have two objects article and comment . What I would like to
I have a NAnt script that compiles our web application, but would like to
I would like to list all network shares but have no idea where to
Assume i have 4.9 value. I would like to split 4 and .9 ...
Lets assume we have a class car. How would You name parameters of function
Assume I have created a compiled re: x = re.compile('^\d+$') Is there a way
Assume I have a function template like this: template<class T> inline void doStuff(T* arr)
Assume I have 10 Methods and 10 Properties. Is there a way to add
Assume we have a method like this: public IEnumerable<T> FirstMethod() { var entities =

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.