Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6845591
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T00:31:11+00:00 2026-05-27T00:31:11+00:00

Assuming I have a class B derived from A A defined foo() and also,

  • 0

Assuming I have a class B derived from A

A defined foo() and also, B defines foo()

I have a method in another class that receives a B* (pointer to B). In that function, can I call the A::foo(), just by using the pointer to B the function received?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T00:31:12+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 12:31 am

    I think the following would do what you want:

    void fun(B* b){
        b->A::foo();
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Assuming I have a class with a method that takes a System.Linq.Expressions.Expression as a
Assuming you have a constant defined in a class: class Foo { const ERR_SOME_CONST
Assuming I have a simple structure that looks like this: public class Range {
Assuming I have a shared activity class defined in a Library project, which does
Assuming I have a base class A and publicly derived class B, how should
I have an Abstract class and a Derived class. The abstract class defines an
I have a class, which has a bunch of subclasses that inherit from it.
Assuming that I have a class named Class , And I would like to
Assuming I have the following: [Serializable] public class Foo { public Bar bar {
I have a class that's currently inheriting from Dictionary and then adds a few

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.