Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8312251
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T20:06:14+00:00 2026-06-08T20:06:14+00:00

Assuming: Lack of obfuscation Hashed video links Is there a way to securely present

  • 0

Assuming:

  1. Lack of obfuscation
  2. Hashed video links

Is there a way to securely present a Flash video player (SWF) without the user determining the streamed video’s direct link (through page source or other means)? Assume the Flash video player is non-proprietary and completely changeable. Would sufficient security be possible without SWF obfuscation?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T20:06:15+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 8:06 pm

    I see 3 possible solutions

    Wowza

    I have tried it and I think it’s the best streaming solution so far. It’s less expensive that Adobe Flash Media Streaming http://www.adobe.com/products/flash-media-streaming.html and its architecture is easier to scale. But this is not compatible with your existing CDN solution. Wowza offers a token based security plugin that prevent a flash client to stream the video without being allowed first: http://www.wowza.com/forums/content.php?51 And it is a true streaming environment so you will be less worried about users sniffing their browser connections and downloading the content. Although it’s not completely bullet proof, it is pretty safe, because you’ll use streaming protocols, such as rtsp://

    Lighttpd + mod_secdownload

    It is also token based and require you to host the videos behind a Lighttpd webserver. http://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/lighttpd/wiki/Docs:ModSecDownload It will make the video links expire after a certain amount of time, which will make hot linking not impossible, but harder to maintain, since it requires the ‘hot-linkers’ to change the links every time it expires. Depending on the length of your videos, it could expire after 5 minutes, which is quite secure.

    CDN Token Auth

    I’ve been using EdgeCast as a CDN for images and videos, and they offer the same type of protection as Lighttpd + mod_secdownload. It’s called ‘Token-Based Authentication’ and it’s probably available in other CDN services too. Using the EdgeCast API I can request a token for a specific URL, with an expiration time. Exactly as I would do with mod_secdownload. With a 5 minutes expiration time, hotlinking become useless.

    So…

    If you can, using a streaming server is the best way to prevent content download and hotlinking. Any attempt to obfuscate URLs in a browser will eventually fail, because it is too easy to sniff browser connections and just repeat the same protocol. For the same reason any obfuscation in the Flash client won’t work, because the browser will reveal a downloadable URL.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Assuming that I had two Models called User and Comment And there is a
I'm assuming my lack of knowledge (I just started learning Flex yesterday, hah!) is
Assuming all my Gradle plugin user going to have a MYAPP_HOME sys variable set
Is there a way to write a clean if nil then in a view.
Assuming I have #post.rb class Post < ActiveRecord::Base default_scope includes(:user) what do I do
Assuming there are 5 items in the settings file ( MySetting1 to MySetting5 ),
Assuming there is a std::deque queue of pointers to tasks to be performed, what
Assuming I have a numerical string: var foo = 0; Assume I want to
Assuming that I have this: enum { A = 0x2E, B = 0x23, C
Assuming I have a ASP.NET MVC 3 application that runs in a web farm

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.