Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 514839
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T07:33:59+00:00 2026-05-13T07:33:59+00:00

Assuming that all headers are guarded, let’s say you had an abstract data type.

  • 0

Assuming that all headers are guarded, let’s say you had an abstract data type.

#include "that.h"
#include "there.h"

class Foo {
 protected:
  // Functions that do stuff with varOne and varTwo
 private:
  that varOne; 
  there varTwo;
 ...
};

Then in the classes that inherit from foo ( and thus include foo.h ), would you also bother including that and this? Normally what I do is include everything that a class needs, regardless of whether would already receive them from another include. Is this redundant?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T07:33:59+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:33 am

    There is one downside to redundantly including header files that would otherwise have been included directly: it forces the compiler to reopen and reparse them. For example, in

    a.h:

    #ifndef __A_H
    #define __A_H
    // whatever
    #endif
    

    b.h:

    #ifndef __B_H
    #define __B_H
    #include "a.h"
    // whatever
    #endif
    

    c.cpp:

    #include "a.h"
    #include "b.h"
    //whatever
    

    a.h has to be opened and read twice — although the #ifndef will make the preproc ignore a.h’s contents in the second inclusion, it still has to at least load the file from disk and read its bytes from the #ifndef to the #endif.

    This can slow down compilation. It will not break your build or anything though, it’ll just be an annoyance in really large projects, where compiles can take many minutes.

    If you use #pragma once in your headers, there’s a good chance an aware compiler will cache the filenames at a higher level, and ignore the second inclusion of a.h altogether. That too can speed up builds.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.