Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6537603
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T10:38:08+00:00 2026-05-25T10:38:08+00:00

Assuming that i’ve implemented *= , = and * operators overloading, which will you

  • 0

Assuming that i’ve implemented *=, = and * operators overloading, which will you prefer to use complexity wise?
Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T10:38:09+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 10:38 am

    Given that I’d usually implement operator * in terms of operator *= and a copy, there is no reason ever to prefer operator *.

    The normal implementation of operator * (and +, -, / etc.) should usually look as follows:

    T operator *(T const& left, T const& right) {
        T result = left;
        return result *= right;
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Assuming that I want to use a hash as an ID instead of a
Assuming that the two are compatible, how can I force Maven 2 to use
I am assuming that as the code is standard C#, I can just use
Assuming that the service is running and in use, and you didn't change the
Assuming that I have an entity which is mapped with Hibernate ( E )
1. Assuming that you don't have Visual Studio installed and you want to use
Assuming that I have to write to a binary file. I can use the
Assuming that writing nhibernate mapping files is not a big issue....or polluting your domain
Am I correct in assuming that the only difference between "windows files" and "unix
Am I correct in assuming that I always need to explicitly deploy referenced assemblies

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.