Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8164561
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T19:20:40+00:00 2026-06-06T19:20:40+00:00

Assuming that the larger a database gets, the longer it will take to SELECT

  • 0

Assuming that the larger a database gets, the longer it will take to SELECT rows, won’t a database eventually take too long (i.e. annoying to users) to traverse regardless of how optimized it is?

Is it simply a matter of the increasing time being so negligible that there is only a theoretical limit, but no realistic one?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T19:20:41+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 7:20 pm

    Well, yes, in a manner of speaking. Generally, the more data you have, the longer it will take to find what you’re looking for.

    There are ways to dramatically reduce that time (indexing, sharding, etc), and you can always add more hardware. Indexing especially saves you from scanning the whole table to find your result. If you’ve got a simple B-tree index, the worst case should be O(log n).

    Apart from theoretical limits, there are also practical ones, for example maximum number of rows per table, but these days those limits are so high that you can almost ignore them.

    I wouldn’t worry about it. If you’re using a decent DBMS and decent hardware… with realistic amounts of data, you can always find a way to return a result in an acceptable amount of time. If you do reach the limits, chances are that you’re making money from what you’ve got stored, and then you can always hire a pro to help you out 😉

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Assuming that best practices have been followed when designing a new database, how does
I am running a select statement in a report that returns 30 rows in
Assuming that I have this: enum { A = 0x2E, B = 0x23, C
Assuming that parsing the equation would not be a problem, how can I make
assuming that I know the PID of a process and want to do a
Assuming that I have a CronTriggerBean similar to <bean id=midMonthCronTrigger class=org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.CronTriggerBean> <property name=jobDetail ref=reminderJobDetail
Assuming that I have a typedef declared in my .h file as such: typedef
Assuming that I know there is a git-daemon running at git://git.mycompany.com , how can
Assuming that one event has multiple handlers, if any of event handlers throw an
Assuming that CompareAndSwap (or CAS) never fails spuriously, can CompareExchange be implemented with CAS?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.