Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 568133
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T13:09:24+00:00 2026-05-13T13:09:24+00:00

Assuming the following mappings are provided: <class name=A table=a_table> <id name=id/> <many-to-one name=entityB column=fk_B

  • 0

Assuming the following mappings are provided:

<class name="A" table="a_table">
  <id name="id"/>
  <many-to-one name="entityB" column="fk_B" not-null="false" unique="true"/>
</class>

<class name="B" table="b_table">
  <id name="id"/>
</class>

Java class:

public class A {
   private long id;
   private B entityB;
   // getters and setters skipped
}

Is it possible to change the Hibernate mapping so that foreign key is still enforced and created by Hibernate upon startup, but class A would look like as the following:

public class A {
   private long id;
   private long idOfB;
   // getters and setters skipped
}

I understand that if I convert <many-to-one... into a <property... this would work, but foreign key would not be enforced by the database.

I need to do this because object B might (or might not) be initialized separately which sometimes causes
org.hibernate.LazyInitializationException: could not initialize proxy - no Session exceptions to occur when a.getB() is called. I would prefer to have it as a long idOfB and load whole object whenever is necessary; this would also make loading of object A quicker.

I believe my question is very similar to this one, yet the offered solution (to use lazy loading) is not appropriate in my case as even if I call a.getB().getId(), I’d get LazyInitializationException whereas if I call a.getIdOfB() I wouldn’t.

Thanks very much in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T13:09:24+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 1:09 pm

    As said

    I understand that if I convert <many-to-one… into a <property… this would work, but foreign key would not be enforced by the database.

    So my advice is: use both

    public class EntityA {
    
        private Integer idOfB;
    
        private EntityB entityB;
    
        // getter's and setter's
    
    }
    

    And

    <class name="A" table="a_table">
        <id name="id"/>
        <property name="idOfB" column="fk_B" not-null="false" unique="true"/>
        <many-to-one name="entityB" update="false" insert="false" column="fk_B"/>
    </class>
    

    Notice when two properties share the same column, you have to put settings about it in just one property. Otherwise, Hibernate will complain some errors. It explains why i define update=”false” and insert=”false” in entityB property.

    regards,

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Assuming the following view model definition: public class MyObject { public string Name {
Assuming the following class stub: public class Foo<T> { private Class<T> type; public Foo<T>
Assuming the following fictional layout Dealership has many Cars has a Manufacturer I want
Assuming following code. There is class MyStream witch has template overloaded operator <<. There
i have populated gridview from SaleDAL class, assuming following is the code, Please ignore
Assuming the following table: USER COLOR ORDER ================== JOE RED 1 JOE BLUE 2
Assuming the following Model: class Model < ActiveRecord::Base def initialize(*args) super self.du = 1000
Assuming the following: public class Order { public virtual int OrderId {get;set} public virtual
Assuming the following model: class Category(models.Model): related = models.ManyToManyField('self', symmetrical = False, through =
Assuming the following class, is there any way to provide a If the member

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.