Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 565067
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T12:49:59+00:00 2026-05-13T12:49:59+00:00

Assuming you have a string containing the name of a method, an object that

  • 0

Assuming you have a string containing the name of a method, an object that supports that method and some arguments, is there some language feature that allows you to call that dynamically?

Kind of like Ruby’s send parameter.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T12:50:00+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:50 pm

    You can do this with reflection in Java:

    class A {
      def cat(s1: String, s2: String) = s1 + " " + s2
    }
    val a = new A
    val hi = "Hello"
    val all = "World"
    val method = a.getClass.getMethod("cat",hi.getClass,all.getClass)
    method.invoke(a,hi,all)
    

    And if you want it to be easy in Scala you can make a class that does this for you, plus an implicit for conversion:

    case class Caller[T>:Null<:AnyRef](klass:T) {
      def call(methodName:String,args:AnyRef*):AnyRef = {
        def argtypes = args.map(_.getClass)
        def method = klass.getClass.getMethod(methodName, argtypes: _*)
        method.invoke(klass,args: _*)
      }
    }
    implicit def anyref2callable[T>:Null<:AnyRef](klass:T):Caller[T] = new Caller(klass)
    a call ("cat","Hi","there")
    

    Doing this sort of thing converts compile-time errors into runtime errors, however (i.e. it essentially circumvents the type system), so use with caution.

    (Edit: and see the use of NameTransformer in the link above–adding that will help if you try to use operators.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.