Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 808577
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T00:35:01+00:00 2026-05-15T00:35:01+00:00

At my place of employment, we are increasingly finding it difficult to develop for

  • 0

At my place of employment, we are increasingly finding it difficult to develop for IE, which was historically the easiest browser to target, from an intranet-app point of view.

  1. It was already deployed.
  2. It already understood NTLM authentication, thus well integrated with our domain-level security.
  3. It had neat, albeit non-standard features such as XMLDOM and XmlHTTP.

Now, we are increasingly irritated by issues presented by IE:

  1. There are several versions: IE 7, 8, and soon 9 beta, which all have slightly different issues related to performance, functionality (especially re:security and zones), and aesthetics.
  2. IE 7 and 8 are slower than Webkit-based browsers. Period.
  3. There are technology limitations such as missing canvas element, CSS bugs, etc. that make it hard to use 3rd party packages or even consistently write code across IE versions.
  4. Users are increasingly using Firefox or Chrome, even for intranet use.

Does anyone have experience with making a transition?

Any advice would be welcome.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T00:35:02+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 12:35 am

    Firstly, check all current intranet apps with a Webkit-based browser. If you are going to make an intranet site that will be broken on IE (eg, using canvas), then you better make sure that you fix any legacy intranet apps that are broken on modern Webkit-based browsers before you force everyone to need to run a non-IE browser.

    Make sure the browsers function correctly on your corporate network as well. For example: Chrome still has some outstanding issues with NTLM/Kerberos. Although this is a small issue if it means you can drop IE. Depending on your user base however, never underestimate the user attention that will be needed for those who have used nothing but IE.

    I use a Webkit-based browser at work, even though we have a ton of crappy/broken IE only sites. I have to occasionally open IE to complete tasks on those sites. Now, I’m okay with it because I’m use to it and prefer the minor pain to be able to use Chrome with everything else. Non-technical employees however are not and would prefer to just sit in IE (since in their eyes, it is Chrome’s fault the site doesn’t work {since it has worked fine for several years [a point hard to argue with from a business perspective (without bringing in ‘technically mumbo-jumbo’ that they dismiss)]})

    So, sure, do it. Just make sure you plan it out so that it goes as smoothly as possible first time around. User buy-in is what you want, not backlash.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

At my place of employment we have a temperamental proxy server which often makes
One place in my rails app requires loading a number of responses from an
I place the .html (which consist of the .js web link) file in the
Background: I remember at my old place of employment how the web server admin
We place our transparent app window, over the window of another process. Our window
My place of work currently maintains a website for several customers which is written
In the years that I've been at my place of employment, I've noticed a
I work in a place that has gazillions of tools which require tons of
I want to place a little image next to usernames on my website which
I place some textfields in my app,those textfield allows only numbers 0,1..9 and .symbol.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.