At start, we have this basic enum.
public enum E_Levels {
[ValueOfEnum("Low level")]
LOW,
[ValueOfEnum("Normal level")]
NORMAL,
[ValueOfEnum("High level")]
HIGH
}
And I would like to get a List<string> whatever the enum. Something like Extensions.GetValuesOfEnum<E_Levels>() which could return a List<string> with “Low level”, “Normal level” and “High level” in it.
StackOF helped me to get one value attribute :
public static class Extensions {
public static string ToValueOfEnum(this Enum value) {
FieldInfo fieldInfo = value.GetType().GetField(value.ToString());
ValueOfEnum[] attribs = fieldInfo.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(ValueOfEnum), false) as ValueOfEnum[];
return attribs.Length > 0 ? attribs[0].value : null;
}
}
And I can call this method whatever the enum : E_Levels.LOW.ToValueOfEnum().
Furthermore, StackOF helped me to get a List<string> for a specific enum.
I made this method in a controller :
private List<string> GetLevels() {
List<string> levelsToReturn = new List<string>();
var levels = Enum.GetValues(typeof(E_Levels)).Cast<E_Levels>();
foreach(E_Levels l in levels)
levelsToReturn.Add(l.ToValueOfEnum());
return levelsToReturn;
}
But this way requires me to rewrite the same method for each enum.
So I tried to add this generic method my class Extensions :
public static class Extensions {
public static string ToValueOfEnum(this Enum value) {...}
public static List<string> GetValuesOf<T>() {
List<string> levelsToReturn = new List<string>();
var levels = Enum.GetValues(typeof(T)).Cast<T>();
foreach(T l in levels)
levelsToReturn.Add(l.ToValueOfEnum());
return levelsToReturn;
}
}
But in my foreach, .ToValueOfEnum() is an unknown method.
So I am in trouble, I hoped I could find a way to not rewrite again and again the same method for each enum…
Let’s try to keep this more general purpose.
I have an extension method that could grab attributes off of enum values. This would give you quick access to the attributes.
Using this, you could create some queries to get what you want.
So your
GetValuesOf()method (which is not a great name for such a specialty method IMHO) can be written like this:Now you may call the method like so: