Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8979791
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T19:55:39+00:00 2026-06-15T19:55:39+00:00

AtomicBoolean stores its value in: private volatile int value; Then, for example, extracting its

  • 0

AtomicBoolean stores its value in:

private volatile int value;

Then, for example, extracting its value is done like this:

    public final boolean get() {
    return value != 0;
}

What is the reason behind it? Why boolean was not used?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T19:55:40+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 7:55 pm

    AFAIK, int is the smallest type CAS operations can be implemented across different machine types.

    Note: as object allocations are 8 byte aligned, using a smaller type wouldn’t save any memory.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

my code : private AtomicBoolean fetched1 = new AtomicBoolean(false); private int rowCount; public int
public class MainClass { private static final int size = 5; private ExecutorService prodExec
Possible Duplicate: Java: volatile boolean vs AtomicBoolean When is it appropriate to use a
What does AtomicBoolean do that a volatile boolean cannot achieve?
I've looked at the other volatile vs. Atomicxxxx questions in SO (including this one
Does Ruby have atomic variables, like AtomicInteger or AtomicBoolean in Java?
I don't like to lock up my code with synchronized(this) , so I'm experimenting
i have this scenario: class MyClass { Producer p; Consumer c; public static void
I have an AtomicBoolean in my service class for an android app. I wanted
How I can use AtomicBoolean and what is that class for?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.