Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 400953
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T16:59:22+00:00 2026-05-12T16:59:22+00:00

Automatic properties let me replace this code: private MyType myProperty; public MyType MyProperty {

  • 0

Automatic properties let me replace this code:

private MyType myProperty;
public MyType MyProperty
{
    get { return myPropertyField; }
}

with this code:

public MyType MyProperty { get; private set; }

with a few changes here and there – but is there a way to replace this code:

private readonly MyType myProperty;
public MyType MyProperty
{
    get { return myPropertyField; }
}

with something similar?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T16:59:22+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 4:59 pm

    No, but this idea is being tracked on Connect.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some automatic de-serialization code that will set an object's properties using KVC
In Ninject there's automatic implicit self-binding for concrete types. So without further configuration I
When creating projects in Hudson, I usually have to check a few CVS repositories
I have a method like this: void m1(string str) and have a class like
I have created a VB.NET 2008 Class Library that has, for the most part,
I've created a custom VS template which uses an IWizard class to do some
I'm using Core data in an iOS project. I have the data model setup
I have a bunch of IEnumerable Collections which exact number and types is subject
i'm having around 13 emulators .i want my app can adjustable in all emulators.
I have a custom NSManagedObject subclass, say, Person . I also have a UIView

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.