Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8521287
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T06:46:51+00:00 2026-06-11T06:46:51+00:00

Back in 2009 I wrote a page ( http://www.ikriv.com/dev/dotnet/JavaClone/index.html ) that contains a lot

  • 0

Back in 2009 I wrote a page (http://www.ikriv.com/dev/dotnet/JavaClone/index.html) that contains a lot of fragments like this:

<sup><a href="#ref14">[14]</a></sup>

I think it looked fine back then in both Firefox and IE. To my astonishment, I found today that Firefox 14.0.1 shows some of them as expected, while some others are shown as if there were no sup tag.

The even funnier part is that IE8 has trouble at exactly the same places Firefox does, only instead of ignoring superscript it inserts an extra line break.

Chrome does the same thing as Firefox: some superscripts are fine while others are ignored.

I could not find any regularity in that, but three things are certain:

  • some fragments are displayed as expected and some are not
  • all major browsers seem to have problem at exactly the same places
  • if I remove the <a> tag, everything is back to normal
  • What gives? Is putting <a> inside of <sup> illegal or something?

    • 1 1 Answer
    • 0 Views
    • 0 Followers
    • 0
    Share
    • Facebook
    • Report

    Leave an answer
    Cancel reply

    You must login to add an answer.

    Forgot Password?

    Need An Account, Sign Up Here

    1 Answer

    • Voted
    • Oldest
    • Recent
    • Random
    1. Editorial Team
      Editorial Team
      2026-06-11T06:46:52+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 6:46 am

      The problem isn’t with sup embedded in a, it’s the a tags with no inner text:

      <a name="Interfaces" />
      

      Inspecting this with Firebug shows that Chrome doesn’t like this. It ignores the self-close and interprets everything after as being inside that a tag.

      Change that like to:

      <a name="Interfaces"></a>
      

      and the problem with the superscript links corrects itself.

      • 0
      • Reply
      • Share
        Share
        • Share on Facebook
        • Share on Twitter
        • Share on LinkedIn
        • Share on WhatsApp
        • Report

    Sidebar

    Related Questions

    Recently I've read this article: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/09/25/svn-strikes-back-a-serious-vulnerability-found/ Developers of many popular sites like apache.org, php.net
    (A while back I read this great post: http://aaronlongwell.com/2009/06/the-ruby-on-rails-cms-dilemma.html , discussing the Rails CMS
    I follow the steps in this page http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2009/12/09/building-and-publishing-an-extension-for-visual-studio-2010.aspx I create a TextAdornment project and
    A blog I came across at http://developer-resource.blogspot.com.au/2009/01/pros-and-cons-of-returing-references.html writes: After working in this code base
    I am using code off this site: http://buildinternet.com/2009/03/sliding-boxes-and-captions-with-jquery/ My problem is I mouse over
    I found this blog about my problem http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alexj/archive/2009/02/25/tip-1-sorting-relationships-in-entity-framework.aspx But its from 2009 and not
    I wrote a WCF service back in 2009, which uses net.tcp. I used VS
    This may be old news but back in March 2009, this article, Model-View-ViewModel In
    Looking at an older stackoverflow post (back in June 2009, Is the WCF REST
    Back in college I wrote a game where the computer would sleep for 1

    Explore

    • Home
    • Add group
    • Groups page
    • Communities
    • Questions
      • New Questions
      • Trending Questions
      • Must read Questions
      • Hot Questions
    • Polls
    • Tags
    • Badges
    • Users
    • Help
    • SEARCH

    Footer

    © 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
    With Love by The Archive Base

    Insert/edit link

    Enter the destination URL

    Or link to existing content

      No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.