Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4237196
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T02:44:29+00:00 2026-05-21T02:44:29+00:00

Background A customer is running our web app. over HTTPS and are running into

  • 0

Background

A customer is running our web app. over HTTPS and are running into the (fairly well know) IE8 “file cannot be written to cache” error when they try to view a PDF/Excel/word file because the response contains the HTTP Cache-Control:no-cache directive. The thing is, it is not our app (or its config) that is adding this directive.

After a bit of investigating I discovered that the IIS7 page output caching feature can also add this header, for example

<caching enabled="false" enableKernelCache="false">
    <profiles>
        <add extension=".htm" policy="CacheUntilChange" kernelCachePolicy="CacheUntilChange" />
    </profiles> 
</caching>

will have the effect of adding Cache-Control:no-cache, private to response headers.

My Question

But the surprising (IMO) thing is that even when you supposedly disable the feature (see in my config snippet above that enabled="false"), the response headers are still being sent with Cache-Control:no-cache, private.

Am I being stupid to be surprised by this (I guess I probably am)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T02:44:30+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 2:44 am

    You’re not alone: http://forums.iis.net/t/1152306.aspx

    We also had the same problem. I haven’t found any documentation about this “feature” so I’m assuming it is a bug.

    We decided to just remove the caching tag and use only the clientCache tag instead.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.