Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 47151
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:04:39+00:00 2026-05-10T16:04:39+00:00

Background I have a massive db for a SharePoint site collection. It is 130GB

  • 0

Background

I have a massive db for a SharePoint site collection. It is 130GB and growing at 10gb per month. 100GB of the 130GB is in one site collection. 30GB is the version table. There is only one site collection – this is by design.

Question

Am I able to partition a database (SharePoint) using SQL 2005s data partitioning features (creating multiple data files)? Is it possible to partition a database that is already created? Has anyone partitioned a SharePoint DB? Will I encounter any issues?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:04:40+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:04 pm

    You would have to create a partition set and rebuild the table on that partition set. SQL2005 can only partition on a single column, so you would have to have a column in the DB that

    • Behaves fairly predictably so you don’t get a large skew in the amount of data in each partition
    • IIRC the column has to be a numeric or datetime value
    • In practice it’s easiest if it’s monotonically increasing – you can create a series of partitions (automatically or manually) and the system will fill them up as it gets to the range definitions.

    A date (perhaps the date the document was entered) would be ideal. However, you may or may not have a useful column on the large table. M.S. tech support would be the best source of advice for this.

    The partitioning should be transparent to the application (again, you need a column with appropriate behaviour to use as a partition key).

    Unless you are lucky enough to have a partition key column that is also used as a search predicate in the most common queries you may not get much query performance benefit from the partitioning. An example of a column that works well is a date column on a data warehouse. However, your Sharepoint application may not make extensive use of this sort fo query.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Say you have a massive stylesheet with a full site worth of selectors, each
Background I have a database for my company site in which I store parts
I have an css background-image that needs to be linked to the site index.
Background Info: File Replication is Lame Currently, we have a massive, high-traffic ASP.NET web
Background: I have an MVC based polaroid object. The model keeps the photo's metadata,
Background I have an array of objects (Users) defined and set as follows: //
Background I have two lists, the first is items which contains around 250 tuples,
Background I have a function that takes a config object as an argument. Within
Background : I have a few different threads which each need to write to
Background: I have a WebPart that makes use of the SPCalendarView control and in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.