Home/ Questions/Q 91413
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-10T23:01:34+00:00

Background I have made a Web Service in Visual Studio, and I’m trying to

  • 0

Background

I have made a Web Service in Visual Studio, and I’m trying to consume it using the automatically generated proxy class. The Web Service returns a class that I have implemented, containing a List.

Question

The proxy class has automatically generated methods to send the SOAP to the web service. It uses the Invoke() method to execute the call, and then casts the result as a DataSet. How can I get this object back into the class I know it is?

I know that I can hand-edit the auto-generated file, but that’s not very maintainable, so I don’t want to go down that route (any time the Web Service is rebuilt, the changes would have to be made again).

Is there a way to tell the generated class to be more specific, and actually use the correct data type? Or do I have to write a clunky set of deserialisers to get my data back into the correct shape?

Example

One method in my Web Service class:

[WebMethod] public UpdateList RetrieveUpdates(long sessionID, string configurationVersion, string coreVersion, string researcherDBVersion) { ... }

Adding the class as a Web Reference generates the following proxy method:

public DataSet RetrieveUpdates(long sessionID, string configurationVersion, string coreVersion, string researcherDBVersion) {     object[] results = this.Invoke('RetrieveUpdates', new object[] {         sessionID,         configurationVersion,         coreVersion,         researcherDBVersion});    return ((DataSet)(results[0])); }

The DataSet I receive from this method is always empty (because you can’t cast from my class to a DataSet).

Thanks in advance

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Since Web References generate partial classes, you should be able to add to your project a partial class extension to the proxy class that reimplements just the method in question (just copy and paste it) but changes the return type (and the name, of course). If the method signature changes, you’ll have to update your extension, but at least if that doesn’t happen and you regenerate the proxy you won’t have to reapply any changes (and you can still use any other generated classes/methods as is).

    I’ve used this approach before to ‘fix’ proxy classes (for instance, to add SOAP headers that aren’t defined in the WSDL), and while not ideal, it does work.

    • 0