Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9294131
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T21:17:58+00:00 2026-06-18T21:17:58+00:00

Background Part of my application’s responsibility is handling requests for static resources (CSS, JavaScript,

  • 0

Background

Part of my application’s responsibility is handling requests for static resources (CSS, JavaScript, images) in a controlled manner. Based on some application logic, it will return one from a selection of different files that might be served on that URL at different times and to different users. These are therefore static files, but delivered in a dynamic way.

The application is based on Symfony Components and the serving of these static-ish files is handled by the BinaryFileResponse class.

The bootstrap code calls the trustXSendfileTypeHeader method:

\Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\BinaryFileResponse::trustXSendfileTypeHeader();

The application uses some internal logic based on configuration and the detection and use of apache_get_modules() to determine availability. If XSendfile is available and the configuration says to use it, it sets the X-Sendfile-Type header:

if ($useHeader === true) {
    $request->headers->set('X-Sendfile-Type', $header);
}
$response = new BinaryFileResponse($filename);

Problem

When I run this with the configuration set to never use XSendfile, or through the PHP built-in web server, which obviously does not support XSendfile, everything is perfect.

When I utilise XSendfile, it also works — most of the time.

Every so often, typically if I press the f5 key 3-4 times in quick succession, “something” wigs out and I get a garbled response. For example, this is supposed to be a JavaScript file (copied from “Response” tab under “Net” in Firebug):

hxYîãx��HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:49:10 GMT Server:
Apache/2.2.22 (Ubuntu) X-Powered-By: PHP/5.4.6-1ubuntu1.1
Cache-Control: public Last-Modified: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:33:23 GMT
Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary ETag:
“10426f-9f6-0” Vary: Accept-Encoding Content-Encoding: gzip
Content-Length: 1011 Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=98 Connection:
Keep-Alive Content-Type: application/javascript

������­VmoÛ6þ,ÿkÀ²ãIý°~q [Üt]
XÑt¶H¤@Rv¼Àÿ}w(YSÀØ2yïå¹*¾Á>¯¥¥,è) Æ^Ât¸BaÆ\éjgäjí
Î&ð*¸Åí¸tY!³Ç$Óe"jÞ![#,n®®oï®A¨þ¸þù××Þ©¼¼ôÇêÚd¹49mv°ÔrtBÖ^;WÍÓÔg´Y¥´FéôÁR9o°35Îà^º­´N=UÐè­Eµ¢XE¸íÒ%ª°¨Úò7¬KñT¾{;£ÈrTnß³étUè{QÀçÍn·:'üJëQÍÄËZeNjOàyÕÁ:#3wö~4Òét1ù$µ
eN)RD|
¶FTØJ·ß½¥¨¸õGç >9TyÜxzgl-J:) b«9ûAQ½KXÉ!yÐÓ]
óÆÎ@W¡?¢vún­·7j©ÿ¢ðõÖGEÁy\ºp¤÷cKxf?ï*¼Éç0^ïîÌǰñDQ¸mYJ|4t¾ñæËÛ¯Å
¨6:çøp(}þÑò|LÂ;Õ(#v¹* /[¨U|xª
æ]ÍyìjµòÛ¯p?4sI¥"v÷ôp|uQ4ò4&Ï·$eÒc¸ xo%7Ôi´2ñx;
TuÙj23 áÊ%ħ¿¹lÌwÀS.&ÏØß7¸}ó
ZXzå k2’Zdùè
�¦ºû-Ù[Ó²ÿU(¯¤¥=pÃjô¾ç]]Øhhô²×ÙãÚÍ4¨[!Õ}’Òþ^Ð�ûxÿ@+ÚVÞ~áÌáy?d
aíD¹·U×ÃÚ]­ õ5íÃø¨o÷ÂAvUÆmÍaày`¦ä©A?mL[-}®(ÿË
d°öò¬}Ç¢³Çp1À^6%0 hTô^ts´ÞíWô
fO¶ö¢ÎNÜæ·HîUôÔ¶±ÌCµsxh.9åçi Û·_ÈÞØ_ÄãY_Ö}G<ì°ý2wÔ¿aw8/þù\ã±þ”0C
oÂh’tE¶À¤¥7I½éßRt.s?á^d|k/Æ)wRw÷cG¿<Þ
¼´°/^ø*ʤAVZ×y¿zÅΪ¥[²Õ1ò_Vµæï_YXÁÕö ��YXÁÕö ��

Note the presence of the headers in the response body, and the rest of it which is clearly not JavaScript. There are also some spurious characters at the start, which possibly is what leads to the headers being pushed to the body. I have tried to determine if this content is the result of gzipping, but I can’t confirm that yet. (See also update below)

Question

Firstly, is BinaryFileResponse even the correct class to use for serving text (non-binary) files? The documentation for the class only says “BinaryFileResponse represents an HTTP response delivering a file.” This isn’t very detailed but it doesn’t say anything about it being exclusively for “binary” files. However the name has its own implications, why didn’t Fabien just call this class FileResponse?

Secondly, and more importantly, what could be causing this? I don’t believe it is a browser issue because it is repeatable in both Firefox and Chrome. Is this a bug in the XSendfile module or in the BinaryFileResponse class perhaps? (I am likely to think it is not the former because I have used it before in a more “raw” way not via Symfony Components, with no such issues).

Has anyone else experienced this? Any idea where I should even start looking to track this down? I’ve looked at the BinaryResponseFile source code but it doesn’t really do much with XSendfile, just sets the relevant header and prevents content in the response body, from what I can see.

Update

I’ve just noticed a couple of things about these garbled responses:

  1. There are no actual headers being sent at all, i.e. on the “Headers” tab in Firebug, for the garbled responses, it only lists Request headers and doesn’t even show the heading for Response headers.
  2. Even if I set some custom header on the Response in PHP, that header does not appear at all in the garbled responses (as a header or in the response body), but the custom headers appear correctly for the responses that aren’t broken.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T21:17:59+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 9:17 pm

    First, let me say that I don’t have any experience with this Apache module, but I’ll try to guide you through a general error deduction:

    You should check if you can reproduce it more reliably. While a web browser might be ok to try it out, you should go for something like curl and do the request multiple times, for example using a bash for-loop.

    for i in `seq 1 5`; do curl -v http://localhost/xsendfile-url; done
    

    The fact that the Connection: Keep-Alive header is set and that there are some weird characters before the actual HTTP header lead me to believe that you won’t be able to reproduce this problem with separated curl calls, because it will open a fresh connection each time. So try this to check if that gives you the weird behavior (curl has keep alive on by default):

    curl -v http://localhost/xsendfile-url http://localhost/xsendfile-url http://localhost/xsendfile-url
    

    Using this, you could go to the projects github issue page and report your findings. Most probably they will there help you in telling you why mod_xsendfile is behaving the way it is or that you have found a bug.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Part of my web application is a background script that polls from a beanstalkd
Background Information: I'm part of a team of developers that runs a web application
Background I'm working on a an educational JavaScript application/site (SPA) that will eventually have
Background I have built a VB .NET application on the 4.0 Framework, part of
Some background: an 'image' is part of one 'photoshoot', and may be a part
.cornerBox { background: url(../img/main-part.png) repeat-x top left ; width: 400px; height:100px; border-radius: 80px; padding:
Background, Part 1 I have a form that collects both frequency and duration from
I have a tiled background graphic with a header and footer part. Something like
This is probably a multi-part question. Background: we have a native (c++) library that
I have a div with 60% opacity, to show part of a background image

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.