Background
Users can type in a name and the system should match the text, even if the either the user input or the database field contains accented (UTF-8) characters. This is using the pg_trgm module.
Problem
The code resembles the following:
SELECT
t.label
FROM
the_table t
WHERE
label % 'fil'
ORDER BY
similarity( t.label, 'fil' ) DESC
When the user types fil, the query matches filbert but not filé powder. (Because of the accented character?)
Failed Solution #1
I tried to implement an unaccent function and rewrite the query as:
SELECT
t.label
FROM
the_table t
WHERE
unaccent( label ) % unaccent( 'fil' )
ORDER BY
similarity( unaccent( t.label ), unaccent( 'fil' ) ) DESC
This returns only filbert.
Failed Solution #2
As suggested:
CREATE EXTENSION pg_trgm;
CREATE EXTENSION unaccent;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION unaccent_text(text)
RETURNS text AS
$BODY$
SELECT unaccent($1);
$BODY$
LANGUAGE sql IMMUTABLE
COST 1;
All other indexes on the table have been dropped. Then:
CREATE INDEX label_unaccent_idx
ON the_table( lower( unaccent_text( label ) ) );
This returns only one result:
SELECT
t.label
FROM
the_table t
WHERE
label % 'fil'
ORDER BY
similarity( t.label, 'fil' ) DESC
Question
What is the best way to rewrite the query to ensure that both results are returned?
Thank you!
Related
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/What%27s_new_in_PostgreSQL_9.0#Unaccent_filtering_dictionary
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/index-refuses-to-build-td5108810.html
You are not using the operator class provided by the
pg_trgmmodule. Create an index like this:Originally, I had a GIN index here, but a GiST is typically better suited for this kind of query because it can return values sorted by similarity. See:
Your query has to match the index expression to be able to use it.
However, "filbert" and "filé powder" are not actually very similar to "fil" according to the
%operator. I suspect you really want:This finds all strings starting with the search string, and sorts the best matches according to the
%operator first.The expression can use a GIN or GiST index since PostgreSQL 9.1! The manual:
If you actually meant to use the
%operator:Try adapting the threshold for the similarity operator
%:Or even lower? The default is 0.3. Just to see whether the threshold filters additional matches.