Home/ Questions/Q 8031575
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-05T01:08:47+00:00

Backstory I wrote a specialized image inliner script that is intended to be used

  • 0

Backstory

I wrote a specialized image inliner script that is intended to be used with both GreaseMonkey and Google Chrome. It is supposed to download PNG files and store them in data: urls in image src attributes. This may sound ridiculous, but a certain website sets Content-Disposition to attachment for images, and I don’t want the «Save As» dialog to pop up every time.

The actual question

The script fetches data with an XMLHttpRequest, encodes it into base64 and stores it in a proper place. So far, good. But it only works when I run it through both Firebug and Chrome dev consoles, and does not when I use it as a proper userscript. As far as I understand, this is because Greasemonkey scripts cannot use XMLHttpRequest objects directly and should rely on calls to GM_xmlhttpRequest instead. However, I cannot set responseType to "blob" or "arraybuffer" that way, and the binary parameter seems to only work for sending data through POST requests. I only get Unicode strings.

Just in case, the images are served from the same domain as the page that links to them. I believe it satisfies the «same origin» thingy.

http://wiki.greasespot.net/GM_xmlhttpRequest here are the GM_xmlhttpRequest docs.

Is there a way to fetch an arraybuffer from within a Greasemonkey userscript?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    If it is same-domain, then you can use XMLHttpRequest, with no problems. The only reason to use GM_xmlhttpRequest (which currently has a crippled subset of functionality) is if the images/files are cross domain.

    For same-domain, you can use XHR2 as shown in this answer.

    For cross-domain, you must: use GM_xmlhttpRequest, override the mime-type, and use a custom encoder algorithm. Again, this is all shown in that same answer.

    However, it sounds like you are just trying to make it easier to download images? If that is so, then you might be better off just using the excellent DownThemAll extension.

    • 0