Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 621889
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T18:55:30+00:00 2026-05-13T18:55:30+00:00

Based on testing a page with ~220 elements, of which ~200 are checkbox elements,

  • 0

Based on testing a page with ~220 elements, of which ~200 are checkbox elements, and each element has to query an array with ~200 items, I was surprised to discover that input selector:

$("input[id$='" + code + "']").each(function() { //...

is approximately 4-5 times faster than

$("input:checkbox[id$='" + code + "']").each(function() { //...

and approximately 10 times faster than a checkbox selector:

$(":checkbox[id$='" + code + "']").each(function() { //...

Also tried universal selector *, which performed about the same as input.

I’m curious to understand why such a big difference in performance?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T18:55:30+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:55 pm

    Your first example is the faster because it only involves the check of the id attribute, on all the input elements.

    The input:checkbox selector is equivalent to an Attribute Equals selector:

    $('input[type=checkbox]')
    

    So basically you are doing two attribute selectors in your second example:

    $("input[type=checkbox][id$='" + code + "']").each(function() { //...
    

    Now in your third example, since you don’t specify a tag name or anything else, it will inspect all DOM elements, since the :checkbox selector is equivalent to :

    $("*:checkbox")//...
    

    That’s why is always recommended to precede this kind of selectors with a tag name or some other selector.

    At the end, your third example (the slowest) is equivalent to something like this:

    $("[type=checkbox][id$='" + code + "']").each(function() { //...
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In my profiler reports I'm increasingly seeing the results of mock-based testing with dependency
Our QA team wants to focus their testing based on what EXEs and DLLs
I have a Flash-based SWFUpload upload button in a HTML page. I am trying
I'm writing a quick web page to control access to a web based repository
I'm trying to build an automatic testing framework (based on jUnit, but that's no
I'm testing a 2D OpenGL ES based iPhone game on both the iPhone 3G
During localhost testing of modular Prism-based Silverlight applications, the XAP modules download too fast
I have my own unit testing suite based on the unittest library. I would
As part of the base class for some extensive unit testing, I am writing
Based on a simple test I ran, I don't think it's possible to put

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.