Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5944509
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T16:32:49+00:00 2026-05-22T16:32:49+00:00

Based on this SO answer: Catching COMException specific Error Code , I’d like to

  • 0

Based on this SO answer: Catching COMException specific Error Code, I’d like to know, to properly handle COMExceptions across OSs and multiple versions of OL, if I need to only look at a specific portion of the exception. For example,

private const uint HRESULT_OPERATIONABORTED = 0x80004004;

// ...

    try {
        // something that could throw COMExceptions
    } catch (System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException e) {

        switch ((uint)e.ErrorCode) {

            case HRESULT_OPERATIONABORTED:
                break;

            default:
                break;
        }
    }

Is this sufficiently cross-platform, or is it necessary to consider only a part of the error code?

EDIT – Just to clarify, my exact question is whether comparing (uint)e.ErrorCode to 0x80004004 is too specific (that is to say, whether or not I always get 0x80004004 for this particular error, regardless of OS/OL), or if this is the proper way to do things.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T16:32:50+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 4:32 pm

    You have little to fear as far as cross-platform compat goes, COM only runs on Windows. Similarly, the error code is a well defined one. You can look up the standard COM error codes in the WinError.h SDK header file. It is E_ABORT. I’d recommend you actually use that identifier.

    You’ll find this header in c:\program files\microsoft sdks\windows\v6.0\include. It is v7.0 for VS2010.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is a further question based on this answer: How can I implement a
Based the accepted answer to this question I've setup a NetBeans/tomcat environment. In testing
UPDATE: Solved. Thanks BusyMark! EDIT: This is revised based on the answer below from
Based on this article , it seems like SO is using Javascript OpenID Selector
Based on this answer Regular Expressions: Is there an AND operator? I tried the
I've been searching here and there, and based on this answer I've put together
In the code from this answer : $.validator.addMethod('lessThanEqual', function(value, element, param) { return this.optional(element)
i would like to use this syntax to update a table in access based
Based on this answer , of how __new__ and __init__ are supposed to work
This question is based on this answer . Why do you get the same

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.