Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Basically I am storing millions of vector3 values in a list. But right now the vector3s are defined like so:
[5,6,7] which I believe is a list. The values will not be modified nor I need any vector3 functionality.
Is this the most performant way to do this?
If you are storing millions of them, the best way (both for speed and memory use) is to use numpy.
If you want to avoid numpy and use only built-in python modules, using tuples instead of lists will save you some overhead.