Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6865181
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T03:00:35+00:00 2026-05-27T03:00:35+00:00

Basically I want an arbitrarily large stack. I know that’s not possible, but could

  • 0

Basically I want an arbitrarily large stack. I know that’s not possible, but could I set aside a few terabytes of my virtual address space for it? I’d like to be able to start at the beginning and walk up the buffer as far as I need, and Linux can bring in pages from physical memory on an as-needed basis. Is something like that possible? Would it have the same performance as just malloc-ing a buffer? Would there be a way to signal to Linux that you’re done with the memory once you pop the stack?

EDIT: I’m wanting this because I want to optimize a recursive/parallel algorithm that allocates lots of memory on each call. Malloc is too slow for me and I don’t want all the threads to trip on each other inside of malloc’s locks. So basically it would be my own run-time stack alongside the real one (one for each thread).

Actually, as long as the run-time stack is big enough that should be good enough. Is there a way to know/ensure the size of the stack? In a 64-bit address space there’s enough room for several threads to be stack-allocating gigabytes of data. Is that doable?

It looks like pthread_attr_setstacksize could work for new threads, but that doesn’t help much if you can be called from any thread …

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T03:00:35+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 3:00 am

    You can create such an allocation using mmap() with the MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_NORESERVE | MAP_PRIVATE flags. When you want to free it back to the system, use munmap().

    Note that the only way you will find out if insufficient memory is available to satisfy your actual use is by your process receiving a SIGSEGV – but this is comes with the territory of asking for a giant mapping much larger than available memory.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I basically want to do a complement set operation in SQLite but not sure
I basically want a method I can call that will set a boolean to
I basically want to do this in code: PersonList myPersonList; //populate myPersonList here, not
I basically want to perform the same functions as this code, but in C.
In an application I want to store sensitive data (which can be arbitrarily large)
I basically want a Python equivalent of this Array in C: int a[x]; but
Basically i just want to do an arbitrary operation using given arguments of arbitrary
I basically want to use link_to to link to the index method of a
I basically want to do this: grep 'example.com' www_log > example.com.YYYY-MM-DD-H:i:S.log ...with of course
I basically want to be able to deploy multiple versions of the same EAR

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.