Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 53491
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T17:04:18+00:00 2026-05-10T17:04:18+00:00

Basically, I’m trying to create an object of unique objects, a set. I had

  • 0

Basically, I’m trying to create an object of unique objects, a set. I had the brilliant idea of just using a JavaScript object with objects for the property names. Such as,

set[obj] = true; 

This works, up to a point. It works great with string and numbers, but with other objects, they all seem to ‘hash’ to the same value and access the same property. Is there some kind of way I can generate a unique hash value for an object? How do strings and numbers do it, can I override the same behavior?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T17:04:18+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 5:04 pm

    JavaScript objects can only use strings as keys (anything else is converted to a string).

    You could, alternatively, maintain an array which indexes the objects in question, and use its index string as a reference to the object. Something like this:

    var ObjectReference = []; ObjectReference.push(obj);  set['ObjectReference.' + ObjectReference.indexOf(obj)] = true; 

    Obviously it’s a little verbose, but you could write a couple of methods that handle it and get and set all willy nilly.

    Edit:

    Your guess is fact — this is defined behaviour in JavaScript — specifically a toString conversion occurs meaning that you can can define your own toString function on the object that will be used as the property name. – olliej

    This brings up another interesting point; you can define a toString method on the objects you want to hash, and that can form their hash identifier.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 123k
  • Answers 123k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer if (int.TryParse(string, out result)) { // use result here } May 12, 2026 at 12:58 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use this method in Global.asax protected void Application_End() { } May 12, 2026 at 12:58 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I finally found a solution (or at least a workaround)… May 12, 2026 at 12:58 am

Related Questions

Basically, I would like a brief explanation of how I can access a SQL
Basically, I'm trying to tap into the Soap pipeline in .NET 2.0 - I
Basically, I'm trying to create an object of unique objects, a set. I had
Basically, I have a class with 2 methods: one to serialize an object into
Basically, I'm trying to selectively copy a table from one database to another. I

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.