Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8901089
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T01:15:46+00:00 2026-06-15T01:15:46+00:00

Because I believe it is a good programming practice, I make all my (local

  • 0

Because I believe it is a good programming practice, I make all my (local or instance) variables final if they are intended to be written only once.

However, I notice that when a variable assignment can throw an exception you cannot make said variable final:

final int x;
try {
    x = Integer.parseInt("someinput");
}
catch(NumberFormatException e) {
    x = 42;  // Compiler error: The final local variable x may already have been assigned
}

Is there a way to do this without resorting to a temporary variable? (or is this not the right place for a final modifier?)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T01:15:47+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 1:15 am

    One way to do this is by introducing a (non-final) temporary variable, but you said you didn’t want to do that.

    Another way is to create a function for both branches of the code:

    final int x = getValue();
    
    private int getValue() {
      try {
        return Integer.parseInt("someinput");
      }
      catch(NumberFormatException e) {
        return 42;
      }
    }
    

    Whether or not this is practical depends on the exact use case.

    All in all, as long as x is an appropriately-scoped local variable, the most practical general approach might be to leave it non-final.

    If, on the other hand, x is a member variable, my advice would be to use a non-final temporary during initialization:

    public class C {
      private final int x;
      public C() {
        int x_val;
        try {
          x_val = Integer.parseInt("someinput");
        }
        catch(NumberFormatException e) {
          x_val = 42;
        }
        this.x = x_val;
      }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to begin unit testing our application, because I believe that this is
I believe I've looked everywhere possible and already feel to silly because I spent
I believe this question applies equally well to C# as to Java, because both
I have a problem with some code and I believe it is because of
I am trying to learn more about BindingList because I believe that it will
I'm a little hesistant against to use it because I believe there can be
I believe variables used in static main method should be also static as well.
First of all, my jQuery (or Javascript period) isn't good. I am trying to
So I know it's considered somewhat good practice to always include curly braces for
We use the DesignSurface and all that good IDesignerHost goodness in our own designer.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.