Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 380123
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T14:57:30+00:00 2026-05-12T14:57:30+00:00

Because of performance tuning I would like to return only necessary properties. Is there

  • 0

Because of performance tuning I would like to return only necessary properties. Is there a possibility/workaround? Pseudo / sample code to understand:

[DataContract]
public interface IMemberOverview
{
    [DataMember]
    public int Id { get; set; }

    [DataMember]
    public string Name { get; set; }
}

[DataContract]
public interface IMemberDetail
{
    [DataMember]
    public int Id { get; set; }

    [DataMember]
    public string Name { get; set; }

    [DataMember]
    public string Status { get; set; }

    [DataMember]
    public string Infos { get; set; }
}

public class Member : IMemberOverview, IMemberDetail
{
    public int Id { get; set; }

    public string Name { get; set; }

    public string Status { get; set; }

    public string Infos { get; set; }
}

and the service:

[OperationContract]
[WebInvoke(
    Method = "GET",
    RequestFormat = WebMessageFormat.Json,
    ResponseFormat = WebMessageFormat.Json,
    UriTemplate = "ListMembers")]
[KnownType(typeof(Member))]
public List<IMemberOverview> ListMembers()
{
    return MemberDAO.Instance().GetAll();
}

[OperationContract]
[WebInvoke(
    Method = "GET",
    RequestFormat = WebMessageFormat.Json,
    ResponseFormat = WebMessageFormat.Json,
    UriTemplate = "Member/{idString}")]
[KnownType(typeof(Member))]
public List<IMemberDetail> Member(string idString)
{
    var id = int.Parse(idString);
    return MemberDAO.Instance().Get(id);
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T14:57:31+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 2:57 pm

    If you want to expose a different view on your object model, then the simplest approach is simply to expose the data on a slimmer DTO – i.e. write a second class (typically in a different namespace) and translate the data between them. Either by hand (write some code, perhaps a static conversion operator, that does this), or with utilities like PropertyCopy (like so).

    Having a separate DTO also allows you to extend your core object model without silently impacting client performance, and makes versioning much simpler.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Because I've made .cpp files and then transferred them into .h files, the only
Because I want to avoid repetitive code, and I'm using a lot of text
Because I'm currently struggling to learn IBM Rational ClearCase, I'd like to hear your
I’m working on tuning and increasing the performance of my IBM DB2 version 9.7
I read on the internet i should avoid lazy regex because of 'worse' performance
I try to avoid doing Count( ) because of performance issue. (i.e. SELECT COUNT(
Is there a fundamental difference in terms of performance with regards to using BETWEEN
I am using an Oracle database that is having slow performance because of joins
I have a question regarding performance. Is there a performance penalty when I call
Because of performance purposes I put loading of jQuery scripts at the bottom of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.