Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6970891
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T16:46:04+00:00 2026-05-27T16:46:04+00:00

before calling: th.Abort(); how can I wait for ThreadState to be ThreadState.Abort and then

  • 0

before calling:

th.Abort();

how can I wait for ThreadState to be ThreadState.Abort and then execute something?
Is it possible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T16:46:05+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 4:46 pm

    You could call Thread.Join() (MSDN). Like this:

    th.Abort();
    th.Join();
    

    The call to Join() will cause the calling thread to wait for that thread to terminate before continuing.

    Also, you probably shouldn’t call Thread.Abort() if your worker thread is interacting with pretty much anything else.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Before calling AddDocument() on IndexWriter , is it okay if I call IndexReader.IsLocked(myDirectory) and
I know that I should have schema of a table before calling NewRow method
Java 6 API question. Does calling LockSupport.unpark(thread) have a happens-before relationship to the return
I want to do some work in a non-primary constructor before calling the primary
Before you answer this I have never developed anything popular enough to attain high
Before I start, I know there is this post and it doesn't answer my
Before I do this I figured I would ask if it was the best
Before I jump headlong into C#... I've always felt that C, or maybe C++,
Before, I have found the Cost in the execution plan to be a good
Before moving on to use SVN, I used to manage my project by simply

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.