Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 48263
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:15:09+00:00 2026-05-10T16:15:09+00:00

Before I upgraded to Firefox 3 I used to constantly use the View Source

  • 0

Before I upgraded to Firefox 3 I used to constantly use the View Source Chart Firefox Addon which shows the source HTML in a very organized, graphical form. Unfortunately, this addon is only for Firefox 2 and the beta version for Firefox 3 now costs $10 on the author’s site.

Anyone know of a similar addon that works for Firefox 3?

(of course, I might indeed pay $10 for this, but first want to ask around if there isn’t anything better and free, as the version for Firefox 2 had its limitations and I don’t really want to pay $10 for something in beta that I can’t test out before paying for it.)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:15:10+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:15 pm

    Is Firebug not sufficient?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Before I upgraded Xcode and the iOS SDk to 3.2.5 and 4.2 respectively I
I am working on an asp.net web application which uses a fair bit of
I have recently upgraded my .Net 3.5 solution containing some C# code projects and
I upgraded CI from 1.7.2 to 2.0. It's mostly working, except all the links
I just upgraded my Mac from Leopard to Snow Leopard and in the process
I just upgraded to .NET 4 from 3.5 and now am having issues getting
Before you ask, yes I need to show this much data. stl() requires two
I upgraded my app to grails 1.3.1 (from 1.2.1). everything works fine expect foo.refresh()
IMPORTANT UPDATE This question was made over 9 years ago. It made sense then,
I've been working at major companies for close to five years doing web development.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.