Question

Below is the program I used for the test. It prints (as expected):

Raise A Event from A Raise B Event from B 

Now, if we change first two lines of the Main to be:

        A a = new B();         B b = new B(); 

the Program will print:

Raise A Raise B Event from B 

which is also expected, as overriding event hides the private backing field in the base class and therefore events fired by the base class are not visible to clients of the derived class.

Now I am changing the same lines to:

 B b = new B();  A a = b; 

and the program starts printing:

Raise A Raise B Event from A Event from B 

What’s going on?

class A {     public virtual event EventHandler VirtualEvent;     public void RaiseA()     {         Console.WriteLine('Raise A');         if (VirtualEvent != null)         {             VirtualEvent(this, EventArgs.Empty);         }     } } class B : A {     public override event EventHandler VirtualEvent;     public void RaiseB()     {         Console.WriteLine('Raise B');                      if (VirtualEvent != null)         {             VirtualEvent(this, EventArgs.Empty);         }     } }  class Program {     static void Main(string[] args)     {         A a = new A();         B b = new B();          a.VirtualEvent += (s, e) => Console.WriteLine('Event from A');         b.VirtualEvent += (s, e) => Console.WriteLine('Event from B');          a.RaiseA();         b.RaiseB();     } } 

Answer 1

We have a single instance (of B) which has the following fields:

• A.VirtualEvent: null
• B.VirtualEvent: Two event handlers

The call to a.RaiseA() just prints ‘Raise A’ – but nothing more, because the private field in A is null.

The call to b.RaiseB() prints the remaining three lines, because the event has been subscribed to twice (once to print ‘Event from A’ and once to print ‘Event from B’).

Does that help?

EDIT: To make it clearer – think of the virtual event as a pair of virtual methods. It’s very much like this:

public class A {     private EventHandler handlerA;      public virtual void AddEventHandler(EventHandler handler)     {         handlerA += handler;     }      public virtual void RemoveEventHandler(EventHandler handler)     {         handlerA -= handler;     }      // RaiseA stuff }  public class B : A {     private EventHandler handlerB;      public override void AddEventHandler(EventHandler handler)     {         handlerB += handler;     }      public override void RemoveEventHandler(EventHandler handler)     {         handlerB -= handler;     }      // RaiseB stuff } 

Now is it clearer? It’s not quite like that because as far as I’m aware you can’t override just ‘part’ of an event (i.e. one of the methods) but it gives the right general impression.