Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Bloch said: Provide Programmatic Access to All Data Available in String Form.
I am wondering if he means to override toString() which should involve ‘all data available‘?
I think the ‘in string form‘ means that the string is for human reading, so override toString() is enough for the advice. Am I correct?
No, apparently he meant quite the opposite of that. If a data member is available as part of the toString() output (or other string methods of the class), Bloch’s fear is that developers using the API will rely on that and parse the strings to get at the underlying data values. His advice is to provide specific accessors for those data elements, to prevent developers from relying on the format of toString()’s output.