Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5985281
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T22:30:27+00:00 2026-05-22T22:30:27+00:00

boolean a = m1(); boolean b = m2(); boolean c = m3(); Currently my

  • 0
boolean a = m1();
boolean b = m2();
boolean c = m3();

Currently my code looks like this and mostly the condition for "c" is bound to be true

if (a || b || c)

Would it make sense to re-write the code as if (c || a || b), so that the if condition can be quickly evaluated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T22:30:28+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 10:30 pm

    Yes that would make sense, but evaluating just booleans is negligible. You’d probably be better inlining the method calls, though so you only execute the code which is neccessary:

    if (m3() || m1() || m2())
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is what my code currently looks like: private boolean[] isInitialized = new boolean[COUNT];
I have code that looks like the following: private void MethodToDo(SpecialObject o) { Map<InfoObj,
Currently i have this method: static boolean checkDecimalPlaces(double d, int decimalPlaces){ if (d==0) return
boolean a = false, b = true; if ( a && b ) {
Function FillAdminAccount() As Boolean FillAdminAccount = True Try SQLconn.ConnectionString = connect timeout=9999999; & _
Why does a System.Boolean take 4 bytes? It just stores one state, either true
I am creating an application which uses a vCard struct . Currently, this struct
I solved a problem recently. But I have this one piece of code where
After this was answered I continued to work my way through the code. It
I have a custom validator method that will check an inputted zip code against

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.