Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 745725
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T09:36:59+00:00 2026-05-14T09:36:59+00:00

Boost’s C99 stdint implementation is awfully handy. One thing bugs me, though. They dump

  • 0

Boost’s C99 stdint implementation is awfully handy. One thing bugs me, though. They dump all of their typedefs into the boost namespace. This leaves me with three choices when using this facility:

  1. Use “using namespace boost“
  2. Use “using boost::[u]<type><width>_t“
  3. Explicitly refer to the target type with the boost:: prefix; e.g., boost::uint32_t foo = 0;

  • Option № 1 kind of defeats the point of namespaces. Even if used within local scope (e.g., within a function), things like function arguments still have to be prefixed like option № 3.
  • Option № 2 is better, but there are a bunch of these types, so it can get noisy.
  • Option № 3 adds an extreme level of noise; the boost:: prefix is often ≥ to the length of the type in question.

My question is: What would be the most elegant way to bring all of these types into the global namespace? Should I just write a wrapper around boost/cstdint.hpp that utilizes option № 2 and be done with it?


Also, wrapping the header like so didn’t work on VC++ 10 (problems with standard library headers):

namespace Foo
{
  #include <boost/cstdint.hpp>

  namespace boost_alias = boost;
}

using namespace Foo::boost_alias;

EDIT: I guess another option is to use the preprocessor to make it work on VC 10? Taking the snippet above:

#ifndef FOO_HPP_INCLUDED
#define FOO_HPP_INCLUDED

#if _MSC_VER >= 1600 /*VC++ 10*/ || defined USE_NATIVE_STDINT_HEADER
  #include <stdint.h>
#else
  namespace cstdint_wrapper
  {
    #include <boost/cstdint.hpp>

    namespace boost_alias = boost;
  }

  using namespace cstdint_wrapper::boost_alias;
#endif

#endif

Less work, I guess?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T09:37:00+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 9:37 am

    I just use C99’s stdint.h (it’s actually now in VS 2010). For the versions of Visual C/C++ that don’t include it, I use a public domain version from MinGW that I modified to work with VC6 (from when I had to work in VC6):

    • http://snipplr.com/view/18199/stdinth/

    There are a couple other options you might consider in this SO question: C99 stdint.h header and MS Visual Studio

    If you’d like to continue using boost/cstdint.hpp, I’d say that the suggestion of implementing a wrapper header that brings the types into the global namespace would be the way to go.

    Does boost/cstdint.hpp provide anything I should know about that isn’t in stdint.h?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 383k
  • Answers 383k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No and no. But I agree, absolutely interesting. May 14, 2026 at 10:53 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer $(".input :input").keypress(function(){ var o = $(this); var s = $("<span></span>").html(o.val()).addClass('placeholder').css('left',… May 14, 2026 at 10:53 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer After much painful research... it seems the most stable approach… May 14, 2026 at 10:53 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.