Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8425175
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T04:11:58+00:00 2026-06-10T04:11:58+00:00

Both CSplit and MapCanvT are subtypes of Scala Swing Component. So type CanvNode is

  • 0

Both CSplit and MapCanvT are subtypes of Scala Swing Component. So type CanvNode is always a subtype of Component. I haven’t got to grips with the functional stuff of Scala collections yet like fold. Is there any way to reduce this code (aside from putting the match in a function) and get rid of those matches?

type CanvNode = Either[CSplit, MapCanvT]   

class CSplit(var s1: CanvNode, var s2: CanvNode) extends SplitPane
{         
  topComponent =  s1 match { case Left (s) => s; case Right (s) => s} 
  bottomComponent = s2 match { case Left (s) => s; case Right (s) => s}

The above compiles. Ideally I’d just write:

type CanvNode = Either[CSplit, MapCanvT]   

class CSplit(var s1: CanvNode, var s2: CanvNode) extends SplitPane
{         
  topComponent =  s1
  bottomComponent = s2

but that won’t compile.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T04:11:59+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 4:11 am

    fold will in fact do what you want here. You can rewrite this:

    topComponent = s1 match { case Left (s) => s; case Right (s) => s}
    

    As this:

    topComponent = s1.fold(identity, identity)
    

    And the inferred type will be the least upper bound of CSplit and MapCanvT.

    Either also provides a slightly more compact way to write this:

    topComponent = s1.merge
    

    Through an implicit conversion to a MergeableEither.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Both are BDD (Behavior Driven Development) capable unit test frameworks for Scala written in
Both vcs roots show success when testing the connection, but one always errors on:
Both List A and List B are of type Products List A = new
Both DataSource and DataSourceID are defined on 'grdCommunication'. Remove one definition. I just got
Both C# and Scala have adopted frameworks for simplifying doing asynchronous/parallel computation, but in
both Subselects runs fine standalone. But I wish to join them togehter, which always
Both the events are getting fired at the time onblur event. <%@ Page Language=C#
Both of these frameworks are great, but I've noticed that Knockout likes to point
Both Network.Socket.ByteString and Network.Socket.ByteString.Lazy have a send function. Network.Socket.ByteString has a sendTo function, but
Both events are fired by Netty framework , with a handle to the ChannelBuffer

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.