Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Both work, but is there any advantage / dis-advantage of using one over the other ?
$("#" + this.id + " > ul > li.active:first")
vs
$(this).find(" > ul > li.active:first")
The second selector works, I’d go with that instead of concatenating the ID into the first selector (looks ugly) and making jQuery look for that same element ID again (redundant).